The above video IS NOT REAL. No real instructor would ever get into the car without a lid on his coffee!
(A short autobiography, pun intended of course, of a humble driving instructor.) It was easy to get the
instructor's license, as the driving school that hired me trained me
specifically to pass the test, which was a simple two-hour road test
which involved an hour of describing to the examiner what I was thinking,
looking at and doing while driving, then an hour of pretending to be an
instructor while the examiner pretended to be a student, plus a written
100 question, multiple choice written test after the driving test. The next day, after
acquiring the instructor's license, the school gave
me a student-driver car, a name and an address and said, "Go pick up
the student and teach them."
No sweat, I thought. Until the student, an
eager sixteen year old female, sat in the drivers seat and said,
Where to?
I became incredibly nervous. I didn't know what to say or
do. I hadn't received any training with regard to teaching; I had no
lesson plans or objectives. I didn't know where to begin. Turns out
she had already learned how to drive at a basic level from her parents, like most of
my students, although there are some who don't even understand how the steering wheel works. And so, I gave her directions to go to the nearest
shopping center, which I figured she knew how to get to, typically, and without another word between us (I didn't want
her to think that I didn't know what I was doing by opening my mouth, although I think I may have
said, "Not so fast," or "a little bit slower, please,"
or something to that extent.)
What I didn't
know was that the purpose of the driver training industry is
three-fold: First, to teach people how to drive, that is how to push
the pedals and steer the wheel, although again, most students
already know how to do that. Second, and most importantly, to
teach people, especially those who already know how to to push the
pedal and steer the wheel, how not to crash, which is just as easy to do as it is to drive in the first place.
And thirdly, how to drive proficiently in a variety of difficult situations, i.e. city
center, freeways, circles, old city, etc.
My expertise is now self-taught, after years
of trial and error. I can't tell you how many of my students
have cried. The girls, anyway. The boys just get pissed off.
Although I
did finally find some guidance in a government teaching manual that
I found buried in the office files some years later, even that wasn't very
helpful. General stuff, like, Start with driving straight first then
move on to lane changes, then do left turns and right turns, and Don't make the
student do anything they're not ready to do. I've had parents
(but never students) complain because I took their poor little precious "children" (who are old enough to drive a car!) out on the freeway.
But hey, it's now or never. This is the time to learn. I've never had a student come back to learn
the more difficult stuff. Ever.
But if you think about it,
really, what's there to teach? Any retard can drive a
car; that is, push the pedals and steer the wheel and make it go
where they want it to.. These days, student willing, I can put a beginner on a freeway
at top speed,
given that they enter on a "freeflow" lane (no merge,) and they
can follow instructions, e.g. "Go fast and steer straight." You
might be surprised how many new drivers, with absolutely no
experience whatsoever, can steer straight and push the gas pedal.
On the
other hand, you might also be surprised at how
many students can't even accomplish this simple task of steering
straight, whether in a back alley or on a freeway. (I find the
drive-straight fast-technique best, as it gives the student a sense
of confidence to perform the more rudimentary tasks such as turning
left or right in a parking lot, which, Lord help me, turns some of
the best students into complete imbeciles.) I once spent an hour trying to teach a student not to drive like he was skiing, back and forth, side to side, until I
finally gave up and took him home with instructions to wait a few
years before coming back. I almost got fired for that one.
Apparently I'm supposed to get into the driver's seat and show
him how to steer straight. But that's an exceptional example. Hardly
ever happens. And besides, that wasn't part of my training. I had to learn that lesson the hard way. Thanks a lot.
But if driving is so easy, why do so many
people crash?
Weel, don't call me a conspiracy theorist, but for every license the government
issues, the government will generate tax revenue from the sale of
gasoline. This is just a simple fact, and may explain why it's so easy to get a license,
if in fact that is the case.
What is fact, is that the
government doesn't really care, on a financial level if not a moral
level, if you crash - you're paying for it. Emergency services are
paid for whether you crash or not anyway. And if nobody complains, why would the government care? That's how a democracy works! Nevertheless, it remains a fact that the easier
it is for people to obtain a license, the more the government earns
in gas taxes.
Think about it. Remember when you got your
license? Was the road test really that difficult?
You may recall that it was certainly very stressful, but
also remember what you had riding on it - your own person freedom, your
status, your ego. That's
what you remember, not that the test was easy. Stop at the stop
signs, go slow in the playground zones, parallel park and your done.
Here's your license, thank you very much, don't forget to fill up and pay your taxes on
the way out. Easy, but stressful.
I don't know if the government issues licenses
easily to anyone with a simple, rudimentary driving ability as a matter of 'secret' policy. It certainly isn't public
policy, if it is in fact policy at all, but the facts are the facts.
The government generates tax revenue from the sale of gasoline as a
result of every drivers license it issues. Fact. Not theory. Fact.
Consider: what do you do when
you have a license? You drive. And what do you put in the car to
drive? Gas. And who receives a significant portion of the sale of
gasoline in the form of taxes? The government. And who issues the
license? The government. Intentional, or coincidence? You be the
judge. No wait, let the judge be the judge. In traffic court. That's
his/her job, the bums. Do you know how much those bums get paid?
Anyway, remember that because you have a drivers license
that does not mean that you are
a good driver. It simply means that you are a driver, with
basic abilities.
Neither good nor bad. There's little opportunity to test you for the things
that matter most, such as attitude. How do you test a person's
attitude during the road test? Ask them if they hate the government?
Examiner: "OK, now I want you to make a left turn, and tell me if
you hate the government. Be honest now...!" The government can't hire an
actor to pretend to be a pedestrian just at the time that you are taking your test,
to determine whether or not you know what to do. You could drive all
day and not see a pedestrian waiting to cross at an unmarked
crosswalk, and yet you get your license anyway.
So what do I teach students? Well, I certainly
don't just teach them how to push the pedals and steer the wheel.
Any child can do that. What I teach is system, common crashes and attitude. Most
people know most of the rules, although some are sketchy on a few
details, but very few know what the most common problems
are. Attitude being one of them.
For example,
what reason on Earth do you
have to get close to the car in front of you? Especially given the fact of
law that if you hit the car in front, you pay, and that the driver
in front can brake - HARD - for any reason at any time and not
be at fault, and furthermore that it's not only the most common
accident, it's not only twice as common as any other accident, it's
not only more common than all the head-ons and T-bones combined, but
it's always the rear-enders fault! Given all that, what possible
reason in the Universe do you have to be close to the car in front? Do you like the car in
front of you? Do you want to be the car in front of you? No?
Then why get close? Fear if the people behind you? No reason? Habit?
But not all instructors are the same. Government
standards require only a certain quantity of instruction, not a certain quality of instruction.
Although instructors are required to grade a student to pass, a
passing student is a happy student, and a happy student is a happy
customer, and business is business. Thus, you pay you pass. If the
instructor is an idiot.
So, if a
student is required to spend a certain amount of time taking driving
lessons, but is not required by government standards to actually learn anything
in particular
during that time, then what is going to motivate a student to
learn, or motivate a driving
instructor to actually teach anything useful, especially when it's
easier to just let the student practice what they already know,
especially if
instructors are not supervised and underpaid and the driving schools
are businesses that want happy customers no matter what, and the students don't
give a damn anyway, especially if their parents are paying for
everything?
Let me give you some examples of idiot
instructors. I've heard of driving instructors taking their
students through hamburger drive-throughs, buying them hamburgers to
make them happy. A happy student is a happy parent who is a happy
customer who makes a happy boss, whether or not the student actually
learns anything, so hey, just give them some candy if that makes
them happy. Drop them off at the mall and pick them up when the
lesson is over, if that's what they're inclined to.
The dealer I bought my car from told me he remembered
his driving instructor (as most people do,) who took him to a bar to
watch a hockey game. (I'd say it's hard to forget an instructor like that!)
A fellow instructor at my driving school was
fired for smoking marijuana with his students. And he was fired only
because he was caught, when the student asked a different instructor
if he'd like to smoke one. When the instructor said no, the student
said, Well you smoked one with my sister! But she had the
instructor confused with a another. And the one she was
with happened to be the owner of the driving school. Oops!
Other fellow instructors have been reprimanded,
but not necessarily fired, for making sexual advances toward
students. Instructors whom I've evaluated (sat in the back seat to
watch,) did nothing but give directions (turn left, turn right) but
gave no instructions, only occasional advice after the fact, like
Oh, yeah, remember not to run the red light.
But what can I do? The instructor I evaluate
(evaluations of fellow instructors is required on an occasional
basis) can be my own boss! What am I supposed to do, tell him he
sucks? Hey boss, you suck. How about a raise?
My own instructors, when I was 16, (I had three
different instructors in the same week,) did the same thing -
directions, but no instructions. In fact, one of them told me to
turn left the wrong way down a one-way street. I failed to look for
signs indicating No left turns, OK, my fault, but he did not prevent me from
turning, and laughed while I tried to turn around in on-coming
traffic. I was merely doing as I was told, as I received no instructions
to watch for signs and make decisions based on those signs. I was
given no advanced warning of what to expect, what to think or what
to do. In other words, no instructions, only directions. If he'd
have given me instructions, as I do for my students, such as "look for the
signs before turning, and do as they say," I'd have done so. It's
like playing a game with someone without explaining the rules first.
No fair!
It wasn't until years later, when I acquired an
instructors license that I appreciated the value of the lesson
learned with regard to not paying attention to signs. So now, instead
of proving to the student that the student is a worthless worm and
that I am superior to the fool, I ask the student, "Can you make a left turn here?"
It
sounds like a request to turn left, but is actually a question. If
they attempt to do so, I point out that they haven't seen the sign,
and explain that they didn't see the sign because they weren't looking for signs, and that I had given them
specific instructions to read all signs, and they had failed to
follow instructions. That's fair.
That's what I teach.
Are you up to speed?
Chances are, even though you have a license, even
though you've been driving for so many years without any accidents,
or
perhaps just a few, and even if you took driving lessons when you
were young, you probably don't have a clue that you are an accident
waiting to happen.
Unless you heed the contents of this site.
Thanks for your attention span.

Here's me after driving out to BC, through the mountains, through the cities,
towns and villages, to visit some folks, without a problem. Was I good or just
lucky?
[top]
|
|

This is an example of what happens when you bang your head on the
steering wheel from something like a little parking-lot accident.
(Or when an instructor smashes your head into the steering wheel. HA HA, just kidding!)
On that note,
remember,
parking lots are not 50/50. The person backing out of a space is
required to wait - as long as necessary - so as not to block traffic and
cause everyone else to wait.
In short, if
you back out of a space, and someone hits you, it's not their fault. Or if you are driving slowly down the parking-lot lane and someone else backs into you, it's not your fault. But either way, insurance companies don't usually pay for small accidents. Remember, parking lots are not free-for-all zones. The rules are the same
everywhere, and accidents are caused by people who break the rules, either breaking them intentionally or breaking them accidentally, in a system of rules where people go fast because there is a system.
|